|
|
|
News from Around the Americas | July 2006
New York Court Declines to Recognize Gay Marriage Reuters
| Spectators watche the annual Gay Pride Parade on Fifth Avenue in New York City June 25, 2006. The New York State Court of Appeals refused to recognize same-sex marriage in a ruling issued on Thursday, saying the issue was a question for the Legislature to decide. (Reuters/Peter Foley) | The New York State Court of Appeals refused to recognize same-sex marriage in a ruling issued on Thursday, saying the issue was a question for the Legislature to decide.
The New York case involved 44 gay and lesbian couples who filed four separate cases seeking to overturn as unconstitutional a 97-year-old state law that defines marriage as between a man and woman.
The couples claimed the law violated their constitutional rights because it defended sex discrimination. The cases were heard together by the court in Albany.
"We hold that the New York Constitution does not compel recognition of marriages between members of the same sex," the appeals court said in its 70-page ruling. "Whether such marriages should be recognized is a question to be addressed by the Legislature."
In February, New York's law was upheld in a lower appeals court, forcing the fight to the State Court of Appeals.
It was one of several initiatives by gay rights activists across the United States, where gay marriage has been a divisive issue in recent years, particularly in the 2004 presidential election.
Massachusetts is the only state to permit gays to marry, while Vermont allows same-sex couples the rights and benefits of marriage but calls them civil unions.
In the November 2004 election, ballot measures were passed in 11 states to ban gay marriages. Ga. Top Court Reinstates Gay Marriage Ban Shannon Mccaffrey - Associated Press Atlanta - The state Supreme Court reinstated Georgia's constitutional ban on gay marriage Thursday, just hours after New York's highest court upheld that state's gay-marriage ban.
The Georgia Supreme Court, reversing a lower court judge's ruling, decided unanimously that the ban did not violate the state's single-subject rule for ballot measures. Superior Court Judge Constance Russell of Fulton County had ruled that it did.
Seventy-six percent of Georgia voters approved the ban when it was on the ballot in 2004. |
| |
|