| | | Technology News | July 2009
Streaming Services Soothe Music Industry Brad Stone - New York Times go to original
Like many teenagers, Josh Wilson, the 13-year-old son of the New York venture capitalist Fred Wilson, has on occasion visited the Internet's peer-to-peer file-sharing services to download music and television shows.
But recently, as Mr. Wilson recounted last week on his popular blog, A VC, Josh has started streaming television shows from Netflix under the family's $24-a-month subscription plan and listening to licensed, ad-supported music videos from YouTube on his iPhone. Asked by his father why he was not using file-sharing services like BitTorrent to download shows like "Friday Night Lights," Josh replied, "BitTorrent takes too long."
The answer neatly encapsulates the remaining hope of beleaguered media executives everywhere, especially those in the rapidly deteriorating music business. After a decade of rampant digital piracy that has helped to gut album sales, a raft of new streaming music sites is making the experience of legally finding and listening to music just as seductive as downloading it free.
Many music industry observers now believe that there is a fundamental shift under way: from illegal downloads to licensed streaming services where users can play any song, anytime and -coming soon- on any device. These sites are free, supported by ads, and with an expanding catalog of songs, they are finally ready to overshadow the more cumbersome, unauthorized services that can be hard for newcomers to navigate.
"We have been on this endless hunt for a decade trying to accumulate both our all-time favorites and the new hits," said Bob Lefsetz, author of the Lefsetz Letter, a music industry newsletter, who believes that the future hope of the music industry lies in charging people monthly subscriptions for access to streaming sites on the Web and their phones. "Why are you going to steal if all of a sudden you can check it out quickly on a streaming service?"
Two recent studies of online behavior contribute to this optimistic view. In June, two British research agencies, MusicAlly and The Leading Question, generated a wave of headlines in the tech press after reporting that the percentage of 14-to 18-year-olds using file-sharing services at least once a month dropped to 26 percent in January 2009 from 42 percent in December 2007.
Similarly, a survey by the NPD Group in the U.S. this spring found that teenagers aged 13 to 17 illegally downloaded 6 percent fewer tracks in 2008 than in 2007, while more than half said they were now listening to legal online radio services like Pandora, up from 34 percent the year before.
The streaming music services are providing not only an authorized but also in some cases a superior alternative, and may be the first obvious stop for a generation that is too young to remember when the original Napster revolutionized the music industry.
MySpace Music makes millions of songs available free, accompanied by ads and links to buy concert tickets and merchandise.
YouTube also streams millions of songs under agreements with three of the four major music labels in the form of music videos and is increasingly available free from mobile phones like the iPhone.
But perhaps the most-discussed licensed service is Spotify which allows their users to quickly search for a piece of music and play it instantly with a program downloaded in their computers. |
|
| |