BanderasNews
Puerto Vallarta Weather Report
Welcome to Puerto Vallarta's liveliest website!
Contact UsSearch
Why Vallarta?Vallarta WeddingsRestaurantsWeatherPhoto GalleriesToday's EventsMaps
 NEWS/HOME
 EDITORIALS
 AT ISSUE
 OPINIONS
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 LETTERS
 WRITERS' RESOURCES
 ENTERTAINMENT
 VALLARTA LIVING
 PV REAL ESTATE
 TRAVEL / OUTDOORS
 HEALTH / BEAUTY
 SPORTS
 DAZED & CONFUSED
 PHOTOGRAPHY
 CLASSIFIEDS
 READERS CORNER
 BANDERAS NEWS TEAM
Sign up NOW!

Free Newsletter!

Puerto Vallarta News NetworkEditorials | Issues | September 2008 

A History of Violence
email this pageprint this pageemail usJeremy Schwartz - Cox Newspapers
go to original



Mexico's drug war has brought the worst carnage the country has seen since the Mexican Revolution. The violence, which has claimed the lives of police officers, judges and civilians in gunbattles and bombings, has led President Felipe Calderón to unleash the nation's military and other federal forces to combat the well-financed and heavily armed cartels that control a $40 billion-a-year drug trade. (Marco Ugarte/Associated Press)
 
Mexico City — Each week seems to bring some fresh horror in Mexico's interminable drug war: In Chihuahua, gunmen execute 13 during a family party; in the Yucatan, villagers stumble upon 12 decapitated bodies; during Independence Day celebrations in Michoacán, someone tosses a grenade into the crowd, killing eight.

It is the worst bloodshed the nation has seen since the Mexican Revolution, and it leaves the unmistakable impression that the Mexican government is overwhelmed by well-armed cartels that control a $40 billion-a-year drug trade.

But other countries have passed through even worse outbreaks of organized crime violence in the past century and lived to tell the tale. Their experiences with murderous cartels and warring crime families may offer a road map for Mexico.

From Chicago during Prohibition, to Sicily during the Mafia wars of the early 1980s, to the near anarchy in Colombia during the 1980s and 1990s, outbreaks of organized crime violence periodically have challenged governments and threatened chaos.

The good news is that in each of those three cases, authorities were able to diminish the violence, something Mexico is desperately seeking to do.

Violence in Mexico has spiked dramatically since President Felipe Calderón unleashed the military and other federal forces on the nation's rival drug cartels in 2006. Drug war-related homicides have reached more than 3,000 this year, a record, as cartels have pushed back against the Mexican government. Increasingly, police, prosecutors and judges have been targets.

This month, the violence reached a new and ominous level with the grenade attack on revelers during Independence Day celebrations in Morelia, Michoacán, Calderón's hometown. With that act, experts say, Mexico might suddenly have become a lot more like Colombia. Though no arrests have been made, officials suspect the drug cartels.

"This is a new stage with attacks on the civilian population," said Jorge Chabat, a security expert in Mexico City. "It's a very disturbing change."

Before the Morelia attack, Mexican authorities had scoffed at attempts to compare Mexico to Colombia. Though Mexican cartels largely have directed their violence at each other or at suspected dirty cops, Colombian cartels, led by the now-deceased drug lord Pablo Escobar, embarked on a campaign of terror aimed at destabilizing the Colombian government.

During the 1980s and 1990s, Colombian cartels bombed shopping malls and police headquarters, blew up a commercial jet, and assassinated governors and presidential candidates. More than 1,000 innocent Colombians were killed by cartels, and the country averaged 3,000 cartel-related killings a year.

That's similar to Mexico's current number, but in a country with less than half the population. Adding to the chaos was Colombia's guerrilla insurgency, which meant large swaths of the nation were beyond government control.

The fear among officials and analysts is that Mexico is beginning to move down the same path.

In Colombia, cartels were resisting extraditions of top drug lords to the United States. In Mexico, the cartels are seeking an end to Calderón's military offensive and a return to the days when the government tolerated drug trafficking in return for lower levels of violence.

Eventually, Colombia succeeded in dismantling the largest cartels, through the arrests and extradition of top capos and judicial overhauls that included anonymous judges using voice distortion equipment. In place of the Medellín and Cali cartels, though, hundreds of minicartels have sprung up. While causing considerably less violent than their predecessors and preferring to keep a lower profile, the so-called cartelitos continue to produce and distribute just as much cocaine.

A similar combination of police work and judicial changes helped slow extreme Mafia violence in Italy. In the 1980s, the island of Sicily was ravaged by a war between the Corleonesi and Inzerillo crime families. In two years, an estimated 1,000 people were killed in Sicily, an island of 5 million. Extrapolating for Mexico's population of 110 million, the Mafia violence would have equaled 22,000 executions per year in Mexico.

Italy quelled the violence in part by sending in police from other parts of the country that were less vulnerable to corruption and prosecuting hundreds of Mafiosi. The judicial victories sparked more violence against prosecutors and judges, but marked an important shift in Italy's war on the Mafia.

But the relative successes in Colombia and Italy (although neither country has come close to stamping out organized crime) only highlight the problems crippling Mexico's anti-drug effort: rampant corruption throughout Mexico's judiciary and police forces.

"What's different is that you had honest prosecutors and judges in both countries," said George Grayson, a Mexico expert at the College of William & Mary. "There is no tradition of a professional judiciary in Mexico."

Mexican authorities have talked at great length about ridding its law-and-order agencies of corruption but have made little headway. Officials have recommended insulating judges from drug cartel pressures, through anonymous trials and better personal security.

And Calderón has proposed a unified national police force, made up only of vetted, well-trained and — perhaps most importantly — well-paid police officers to replace the present corrupt agencies.

Mexican officials also hope a $1.4 billion U.S. aid package, which includes training and high-tech equipment, will help build reliable police forces.

Chicago during Prohibition offers an example of another path that Mexico could take, but one that is even less likely, analysts say.

Chicago, which was terrorized by alcohol cartels for a decade, mirrored Mexico in one important way: the bootleggers' ability to thoroughly corrupt local officials. Despite hundreds of killings during the 1920s, not one of Al Capone's hit men was convicted, according to some historical accounts. The feds eventually nabbed Capone on tax evasion charges, but the violence associated with alcohol trafficking didn't stop until the end of Prohibition.

With the Mexican cartels so powerful — their income is estimated at more than 10 percent of Mexico's federal budget — some see legalization as the only way out of the cycle of violence.

"The only way we can alleviate or look to control (Mexico's drug violence) is to look at how the Chicago mafias were dealt with — either through legalization or special laws to deal with consumption of drugs," said Hector Dominguez, a University of Texas professor specializing in the literature of Mexican organized crime.

Dominguez said Calderón's policy of using the army to confront the cartels risks the rise of a militarized state and could hinder Mexico's attempts to build a functioning democracy. But even experts who favor what some call the Chicago solution say that legalization has few political possibilities because it would have to come from the United States, the consumer of the vast majority of the Mexican cartels' drugs.

"Can you imagine if (Sens. John) McCain or (Barack) Obama even hinted (about legalization), what would happen to them?" asked Grayson. American politicians "are afraid the opposing party will make hay if they discuss it."

Even within Mexico, there is little clamor for legalization: Although the left-leaning Democratic Revolutionary Party favors it as a policy, few Mexican politicians talk seriously about it.

Some experts say that the best Calderón can hope for is a Colombia-like solution, in which the large cartels are fragmented into smaller, less-threatening groupings. There's some evidence that is already happening as internal feuds within the dominant Sinaloa and Gulf cartels increase.

But experts say Mexico's future remains uncertain. Will the country turn ever more violent or will it hit on a solution? If history is any guide, things are likely to get better — eventually.

Mexico's major drug cartels

Gulf cartel: Based in Matamoros, in the state of Tamauilipas along the Texas border, it has been one of Mexico's two dominant cartels in recent years. It has been strengthened by its armed wing called the Zetas, highly trained military deserters blamed for bringing new levels of savagery to the drug wars. The cartel was weakened in 2007 with the extradition of leader Osiel Cárdenas, now awaiting trial in Houston. A one-time alliance with the La Familia organization in Michoacán has fallen apart, leading to violence between the groups.

The Federation: The result of a 2006 accord among several groups in the Pacific state of Sinaloa, it also is called the Sinaloa cartel. It is led by Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, Mexico's most wanted drug trafficker. An internal rift has pitted the Beltran-Leyva organization against the Federation, leading to heavy fighting in Sinaloa and in Ciudad Juárez.

Tijuana cartel: The cartel of the Arrellano-Felix family, the Tijuana cartel was once among Mexico's most powerful, but has fallen on hard times thanks to arrests of several top capos. The cartel entered into a brief partnership with the Gulf cartel, which has since disintegrated. It has been the frequent target of Mexican military confrontations and might be breaking into smaller groups.

Juárez cartel: The former powerhouse has been reduced to second-tier status. It formed part of the Federation after it entered into an agreement with the Sinaloa cartels, which have moved into its previous zones of influence. More recently, it has broken with the Sinaloans.

Sources: Stratfor, Congressional Research Service

jschwartz(at)coxnews.com



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes • m3 © 2008 BanderasNews ® all rights reserved • carpe aestus