BanderasNews
Puerto Vallarta Weather Report
Welcome to Puerto Vallarta's liveliest website!
Contact UsSearch
Why Vallarta?Vallarta WeddingsRestaurantsWeatherPhoto GalleriesToday's EventsMaps
 NEWS/HOME
 EDITORIALS
 AT ISSUE
 OPINIONS
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 LETTERS
 WRITERS' RESOURCES
 ENTERTAINMENT
 VALLARTA LIVING
 PV REAL ESTATE
 TRAVEL / OUTDOORS
 HEALTH / BEAUTY
 SPORTS
 DAZED & CONFUSED
 PHOTOGRAPHY
 CLASSIFIEDS
 READERS CORNER
 BANDERAS NEWS TEAM
Sign up NOW!

Free Newsletter!

Puerto Vallarta News NetworkEditorials | Opinions | October 2008 

Reality Is No Rehearsal
email this pageprint this pageemail usDr. Wilmer J. Leon III - t r u t h o u t
go to original



GOP vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin exits the stage after last night's televised debate against Democratic vice-presidential candidate Joseph Biden. (Reuters)
 
Governor Sarah Palin did very well in the vice-presidential debate. She was well handled, well rehearsed and well prepared. For a 90 minute, tightly structured quasi-debate she was able to hold her own. She demonstrated a cursory understanding of some very general issues affecting America today. The problem is the real world is unrehearsed; life is live. This was not as her handlers have stated, Sarah Palin "unplugged" or "unfiltered." It was just the opposite. In the few instances where Governor Palin has been "unplugged" and allowed to respond in an unrehearsed fashion, she has failed miserably.

Many conservative Americans fell in love with Governor Palin after she delivered a well-written and well-rehearsed speech at the Republican National Convention. Based upon that performance, a floundering McCain campaign became buoyant and gained the support from the Republican conservative base that it had been seeking since he clinched his party's nomination.

Eight days after her speech at the Republican Convention, Governor Palin sat down for an unscripted and unrehearsed television interview with ABC's Charlie Gibson. She demonstrated to America she has very little if any insight into, or understanding of, the salient issues that are impacting America today. When asked about the Bush Doctrine, Governor Palin had absolutely no clue what Charlie Gibson was referencing. This doctrine is a standing six-year-old policy of military intervention. One would expect the person seeking the second highest office in the land would understand a failed doctrine that totally disrupted the world order and nearly bankrupted this nation.

She believes the war in Iraq is a part of God's plan. Her religious justifications for the invasion in Iraq sound very similar to the Muslim fundamentalists that attacked America; according to them, they were carrying out the will of Allah. This is why religious fundamentalism has no place in foreign or domestic policy.

When asked if America has the right to make cross-border attacks into Pakistan from Afghanistan, with or without the approval of the Pakistani government, Governor Palin's answer was so incoherent that Charlie Gibson had to restate the question by saying, "And let me finish with this. I got lost in a blizzard of words there."

From ABC and Charlie Gibson, Governor Palin went to CBS with Katie Couric. Again, this was an unscripted and unrehearsed television interview. This time, she demonstrated she did not really understand the voting record of her own running mate. When asked to give examples of Senator McCain leading the charge for increased oversight of the financial industry, Governor Palin went into the standard "maverick" line, and then said, "I'll try to find ya some and I'll bring 'em to ya." When asked by Katie Couric in another interview about the newspapers and magazines she reads that impact her worldview, Governor Palin responded, "I've read most of them, again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media." When pressed for specifics, she responded, "Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me all these years." She never named one newspaper or magazine. Not even a paper from Alaska like the Anchorage Daily News or the Wasilla Frontiersman.

When asked a question about partisanship in an interview with Sean Hannity, Governor Palin said, "Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we're talking about today. And that's something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this." What? "... surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed ..." Can you imagine a Vice President Palin on the world stage representing America with mindless dribble such as this? Has not President George W. Bush been embarrassing enough?

After these interviews, Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric were attacked for being too tough on Governor Palin and engaging in "gotcha" journalism. As responsible journalists, it was not their fault for asking direct and relevant questions. It was Governor Palin's fault for not being able to answer them.

As an informed electorate, we should want to hear from and clearly understand the candidate's views on the economy, health care, international trade etc. What's the basis of Governor Palin's world view? Effective foreign policy is based upon a clear understanding of culture, history, economics, and other geopolitical dynamics that motivate people to act and interact. It is difficult to develop a clear worldview when you have not traveled the world. It is troubling to learn that Governor Palin received her first passport in 2007, and has only taken one trip outside of North America in her entire adult life.

As American voters assess and analyze Governor Palin's performance during the quasi-debate, it is important to understand what they were watching. They were watching a person who was well handled and rehearsed. This was not Sarah Palin "unplugged." She was able to manage fairly simple issues for a 90-minute period in front of a live audience. She did that well. The problem is the real world is unrehearsed; life is live.

Where she fails America terribly is in her obvious lack of command of the subject matter. Where's the gravitas? What is evidenced through her unrehearsed exchanges with the Gibsons, Courics and Hannitys of the world, is a person who has not thought much about world events, their causes and effects. When asked about Iraq, she said, "I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq." Really? Where have you been since March 20, 2003?

Kathleen Parker, conservative writer for the National Review, wrote after the interviews referenced above, "... circumstances have changed since Palin was introduced as just a hockey mom with lipstick - what a difference a financial crisis makes - and a more complicated picture has emerged ... As we've seen and heard more from John McCain's running mate, it is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem ... Palin's recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League."

If, as President Reagan said, "America is a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere," we must raise the bar, not lower it. After almost eight years of George W. Bush, we can see very clearly the problems that a less-than-knowledgeable leader can cause. If America is going to be a beacon, the lights must at least be on. Unfortunately, with what I've seen from Governor Palin, that light keeps getting dimmer, and dimmer and dimmer...



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes • m3 © 2008 BanderasNews ® all rights reserved • carpe aestus