BanderasNews
Puerto Vallarta Weather Report
Welcome to Puerto Vallarta's liveliest website!
Contact UsSearch
Why Vallarta?Vallarta WeddingsRestaurantsWeatherPhoto GalleriesToday's EventsMaps
 NEWS/HOME
 EDITORIALS
 AT ISSUE
 OPINIONS
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 LETTERS
 WRITERS' RESOURCES
 ENTERTAINMENT
 VALLARTA LIVING
 PV REAL ESTATE
 TRAVEL / OUTDOORS
 HEALTH / BEAUTY
 SPORTS
 DAZED & CONFUSED
 PHOTOGRAPHY
 CLASSIFIEDS
 READERS CORNER
 BANDERAS NEWS TEAM
Sign up NOW!

Free Newsletter!

Puerto Vallarta News NetworkEditorials | Opinions | April 2009 

When Racists Control a Racism Conference
email this pageprint this pageemail usDale McFeatters - Capitol Hill Blue
go to original



Last week: President Obama defends decision to boycott UN anti-racism conference - UN replies (The Real News Network)
President Obama has been accused of being too accommodating and too willing to please in foreign affairs. But he was quite direct in announcing over the weekend that the United States, "with regret," would boycott the U.N. conference on racism in Geneva this week.

". . . our participation would have involved putting our imprimatur on something we just don't believe," the president said.

Like the U.N. commission on human rights, the most active players in the conference on racism seem to be the nations whose records least bear scrutiny.

Since an earlier conference on racism in 2001, which the U.S. ended up walking out of, some of the participants have tried to engineer language that conflates Zionism with racism and thus, by extension, making Israelis racist.

The U.S., not surprisingly, finds this totally unacceptable as it did attempts by Muslim nations to effectively outlaw criticism of Islam, the prophet Muhammad -- the Danish cartoons still rankle -- and Sharia law. And the tone of the conference is that racism and intolerance are largely the problem of the developed West.

The U.S. is not alone in boycotting the conference. Eight other nations -- Australia, Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and New Zealand -- did too, meaning whatever the final document the conference produces will fall considerably short of authoritative.

Obama's decision to boycott the gathering was not only right but prescient.

Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, got the conference off to a calamitous start by claiming that the West used the Holocaust as a pretext for oppressing the Palestinian people, the Israel was a "most cruel and repressive regime" and that the U.S. invasion of Iraq was the result of a Zionist conspiracy.

That prompted 24 other countries to walk out, including some 40 diplomats from the European Union. Even the U.N. secretary general Ban Ki-moon, generally reluctant to criticize a member nation, called Ahmadinejad's remarks "a totally unacceptable situation."

Some of the nations that walked out, like Britain and France, suggested they would return but it will be to a considerably diminished and tarnished conference.

Obama may have regretted the U.S. boycott when he announced it over the weekend but it's unlikely that he does now.



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes • m3 © 2009 BanderasNews ® all rights reserved • carpe aestus